Looking for Alternatives to Kurtosys
for Fund Fact Sheet Automation?
Learn the 3 approaches to fund fact sheet automation, compare the top vendors, and find out which solution is best for you.
You’ll learn in this report:
- Pros and cons of the 3 top solution approaches
- The 3 main techniques for investment marketing content automation
- An detailed comparison matrix of top solution vendors: Kurtosys, Synthesis, and Seismic
“You definitely need to account for the time it’s going to take to prep data for Kurtosys. Most of our time is spent scrubbing our data to get it into the right format for their data handler.” – Kurtosys Client
Why look for alternatives to Kurtosys?
Kurtosys takes a fully outsourced approach to fact sheet automation. Firms who prefer Kurtosys are usually working with limited staff resources for production and therefore need the work off their team’s plate.
If your firm is experiencing these issues, you might be looking for an alternative to Kurtosys:
- Lengthy turnaround times
- Frequent data errors
- Missed time-to-market deadlines
Two alternatives to outsourcing are the DIY and turnkey (hybrid) approaches. We explain the differences in these 3 approaches in our exclusive report. Complete the form now to request your free copy.
Why should investment managers read this report?
Implementing content automation can be stressful, but it doesn’t have to be. If you’re using Kurtosys or a similar outsourced approach, your firm may have little-to-no control over speed-to-market and quality. This makes production cycles long and more difficult than they need to be. If you’re looking for a better way, we urge you to take a look at this free report. We conducted extensive research using third-party interviews with happy clients of Kurtosys, Synthesis, and Seismic to uncover the pros and cons of each provider’s approach. We hope this valuable insight helps you when it’s time to reevaluate your options.
