Category Archives: FinTech
The following is a guest post by Dan Sondhelm, CEO of Sondhelm Partners. This post originally appeared on the Sondhelm Partners Blog.
The economic pressure that has weighed down asset managers over the last couple of years will continue to mount in 2019, especially as the tide of market-induced asset growth subsides. The established industry trends – rising passive inflows, fee compression, increased regulation, continuing platform rationalization – are inescapable, threatening profit margins of the least prepared asset managers. In response, firms are intensifying their efforts to streamline distribution costs and improve their offerings, but many still fall short of differentiating themselves among financial advisors, which could be the ultimate key to sustainable profits in this shifting landscape.
When developed and used properly, buyer personas can help marketers and salespeople win more business. By talking to clients, leads, and prospects, your team can implement highly effective communications that drive new and retained assets. When a company develops effective communications, it leaves buyers thinking, “This firm really gets me.” Read More
In 2018, we conducted a Mutual Fund Fact Sheet Production Study, where we analyzed 235 factsheets from 47 asset management firms of all shapes and sizes. A few factors observed included publish date, modification date and how the file was produced (manually or with automation). To find the firm’s production method, we turned to the metadata to show us what applications, software, or tools they were using to create the PDFs. After digging deeper into the metadata, we identified some key reasons why firms have longer production durations or later release dates. We were also able to make some observations about what drives efficiency, and the findings were pretty shocking. Read on to get the scoop!
By: John Toepfer
When looking at content automation and sales enablement solutions, firms are often confronted with a tough decision: To build or buy? Over the past 20 years in this business, I’ve participated in many of these discussions and seen the decision go both ways. Sometimes the decision is successful and other times it ends up a costly mistake. On one hand, it isn’t always less expensive nor less risky to build software solutions in-house as opposed to buying commercial solutions. I’ve seen cases where application development projects were initiated with the intent of justifying and maintaining the technology team, but unfortunately never get off the ground because they can’t be supported technically or economically. What then ends up happening, after all the internal effort and expense, is a new commercial solution is procured to replace it. On the other hand, there are times when the technological or business needs are so pertinent to the company’s value or operations, that they cannot be outsourced. In these circumstances, if the project or platform has the board of directors’ approval and the IT organization is truly committed to the budget and vision, then there’s a good case for insourcing as opposed to outsourcing. At the end of the day, the success or failure of any development effort should be measured against the same criteria. When weighing the decision to build or buy, I recommend using these six criteria: